Tuesday, 12 March 2013

Why palladium is the metal to watch

Palladium has been one of the better performing commodities in 2013, with prices back to levels seen in early 2011.  Palladium has also drastically outpeformed platinum, with the ratio between the two prices dropping to the lowest level in three years.

There are compelling reasons to think that prices should move higher not withstanding potential weakness in other precious metals.  To be sure, there is a broad consensus that the palladium market is set for multi-year deficits.

The key question, however, is at what price inventories might start to be drawn down.  I think stocks are relatively high notwithstanding the end of large Russian government sales and discounting ETF holdings.  But given the outlook for consumption is so positive and mine supply isn't doing too much, I think consumers will be happy to strategically hold large stockpiles, which shouldn't in itself provide downside risk to prices at these levels.

The demand side of the equation for palladium is simpler and more positive than platinum.  Autocatalysts account for a large share of palladium demand than its sister metal, while the price-sensitive jewellery component is small.

Palladium is also much more exposed to auto volume growth by virtue of being almost exclusively used in gasoline three-way catalysts.  The three biggest gasoline-oriented markets in China, the US and Japan have collectively shown strong growth in early 2013 and the multi-year outlook is positive.

Furthermore, palladium is benefitting from substitution in diesel autocatalysts.  So while European auto demand is poor, palladium consumption is still increasing at the expense of platinum.

The mine supply side of the equation is perhaps not as challenging as platinum, but is nonetheless difficult.  Russia/Norilsk is the largest producer of palladium in the world, but production plans are stable for the foreseeable future.  Zimbabwe and North America have provided some growth, but generally production will probably only get back to 2011 levels in 2014.

While it is consensus that the demand and supply equation will be in deficit for a long time what is more controversial is the level of inventory.

Since the mid-1990s, the big uncertainty was the drawdown of Russian stockpiled metal that was managed by the state run agency Gokhran.

But these stockpiles are now reportedly greatly reduced, with sales in the last few years much lower and likely to be close to zero in the years to come.

This metal, however, has not been entirely consumed.  Some of it has ended up as ETF holdings.  Some of it remains in private vaults in Switzerland.  It also appears that consumers of palladium have built up inventory too.

Looking at trade data gives us some sense of what is going on.  Switzerland is a hub for storage in vaults and is traditionally where we have seen large movements of Russian material.  In the past few years, imports from Russia have been low. Exports have also periodically large, with positive net exports suggesting a drawdown of stocks in Switzerland.

But a big portion of this does seem to be going into more visible stock in ETFs, which broadly corresponds with exports to the UK.

While this could just be seen as stock shifting, I think the ETF holder are a much different beast to the private banker hoarding metal in Switzerland.  In particular, their price point at which they will sell out is likely to be quite different.

Not all of this Russian metal has ended up in the hands of more visible investors.  2011 was interesting in that we saw large flows from Russia into the US, where metal for some large auto catalyst makers is pooled. This pushed the US into a significant net import position.

Around the same time we also saw an increase in exports of palladium into China, although that has since tailed off in the later stages of 2012.

To me this is a sign that autocatalyst makers built up stock in 2011 given the outlook for deficit markets for years to come driven by the strong outlook for growth in Chinese palladium consumption.

Does the fact that catalyst have more than enough metal at the moment provide downside risk to prices?  I dont think so at this price point, as much of this purchasing was done around similar prices to what we have seen today.  This to me suggests that the catalyst makers themselves think palladium prices are relatively low compared to what we are likely to see over the next few years.

Consumers could be wrong, with strong recycling or thrifting/substitution in other end uses like electronics potentially providing downside risks.  But for me, prices are likely to have to go quite a bit higher first before the risk of thrifting or destocking or investor selling becomes a risk.









Enter your email address:


Delivered by FeedBurner